Seems to me that the party could do with a defined arbiter/final decision maker for group activities. This could avoid long, drawn-out discussions about what to do next that we’ve been having and the general dissatisfaction when your opinion is not heard. It would also focus that person on making a responsible decision for the whole group rather than simply trying to each make our own point. My suggestion is that we appoint one player as leader , rotating leadership for each session. That way we all get a stab at it. I for one am fed up with long discussions and disagreements on stuff. Anyone agree or got better ideas?