Seems to me that the party could do with a defined arbiter/final decision maker for group activities. This could avoid long, drawn-out discussions about what to do next that we’ve been having and the general dissatisfaction when your opinion is not heard. It would also focus that person on making a responsible decision for the whole group rather than simply trying to each make our own point. My suggestion is that we appoint one player as leader , rotating leadership for each session. That way we all get a stab at it. I for one am fed up with long discussions and disagreements on stuff. Anyone agree or got better ideas?
David J Rodger ¦ Science Fiction & Dark Fantasy
Personal Blog, Thoughts, Work-In-Progress, Promotions and Special Discounts from British Author David J Rodger
About
Latest Comments
New Release
z’Stas: I am the obvious choice for this task. I am the most knowledgeable in the group and I am the oldest with most experience. However, I don’t mind allow you guys a turn each, just to prove my argument.
One thing though, lets skip Annie. She will get us all killed!
Jair says, “Sounds like something that could work. I for one have found the interminable debates tedious and pointless. I’m not for leadership, however. Not my style.”
Jair- that’s my frustration too. As long as you’re happy to go with the flow..
Z’Stas- if you leading helps us all to pull together, I’m all for it. Just remember, that if a single leaf falls from a tree, it may not mean that it is Autumn.
Ani, its a good point and I agree. We’ve been working together now as a group for several weeks, and the simplicity of our initial circumstances, where a clearly defined leader is not essential to our survival, has given way to much more demanding situations.
However, the person leading MUST agree to what you suggested – to make a “responsible decision for the WHOLE group”. If we all agree on that, it will work and I’ll support them fully.